Same brands, same weights, two different answers. The numbers below are deposit-tested and the scores recompute every build.
| Spec | Razed | Rollbit |
|---|---|---|
| WCI score | 53 (Caution) | 78 (Strong) |
| Tier | B | A |
| Overall rating | 8.5/10 | 7.6/10 |
| Welcome bonus | 100% up to $500 | 15% rakeback (24h) |
| Promo code | MAXBET | TOPBONUS |
| Cryptos accepted | 12 | 9 |
| Min deposit | ~$1 USDT / 0.00002 BTC | 0.00002 BTC (~$2) |
| Withdrawal speed | Instant to a few minutes | under 5 min |
| Licence | Anjouan Gaming (ALSI-132405034-FI3) | Curaçao Gaming Authority (sub-licence under Curaçao master licence) |
| Year founded | 2024 | 2020 |
| Game count | 4,000+ | 7,000+ |
| Live streaming | No | No |
| Component | Razed | Rollbit |
|---|---|---|
| Reserves (30%) | 20 | 79 |
| Payout (25%) | 85 | 85 |
| Age and history (20%) | 55 | 78 |
| Licence (15%) | 55 | 70 |
| Trend (10%) | 65 | 65 |
The 25-point WCI gap is not noise. At the cashier that translates into the kind of difference you notice on the second or third withdrawal, not the first. Rollbit clears the formula on reserves and payout history without leaning on the licence or age components to carry the score. Razed carries the lower number because at least one of those components is doing less work, and the page on /withdrawal-confidence/ tells you which one.
Rollbit runs a zero-rollover welcome, which is the unusual variable here. Zero rollover means winnings from the bonus convert to cash on the first qualifying bet rather than after multiple replays of the bonus value. That makes the Rollbit offer the higher expected-value pick even before you compare the headline numbers.
Coin breadth: Razed accepts 12 cryptos against 9 at Rollbit. If you hold something past the top five, the breadth matters at deposit time and at withdrawal time. If you only ever move USDT or BTC, the breadth is a feature you do not use, and the count is irrelevant.
Where the two brands actually diverge on product: licence (Anjouan Gaming (ALSI-132405034-FI3) versus Curaçao Gaming Authority (sub-licence under Curaçao master licence)) and operating history (Rollbit is the older book by several years). Those are the axes that should decide the pick if the WCI gap is small. None of them shows up in the welcome banner, which is the operator preference, not the player one.
Take Rollbit. WCI 78 against 53 is not a close score. On withdrawal speed, on rollover terms, on coin breadth, the gap is large enough that the smaller-volume player and the heavier-volume player both end up at the same answer. Razed is the right pick only if it offers a specific bonus structure or product range you cannot get elsewhere, and on the brands we test, that case is rare.
